Today I Cried

10 January 2007

Taken

Do you know what a modem-router is? I didn't until I started figuring out how to better integrate the nearly forgotten branch offices at my last job. This modem-router was a Netgear 4-port router with a built-in 56.6kbps modem. Yes, that's right, the staff were all splitting a dial-up connection.

Over the years I spent a lot of time attempting to integrate the branch office staff so they were less remote. This included VPNs and Citrix, new hardware and regular visits. Eventually many staff were mobile and it worked mostly well. My final hoorah was supposed to be setting up a new phone system that should have made everyone just 3-digits away. The phone system, 15-years old, needed to be replaced anyway, so it was a good opportunity. However, having never worked in telephony, I look back and realize this was one big job to take on. 90 staff, 5 sites, 1 me. It wasn't a complete failure, but I grew a few gray hairs that have stayed with me.

Lesson one has to be not to push the technology envelope on a tight budget. The immediate project budget was robust but monthly recurring charges had to be kept lean. To make the 3-digit extension scheme work vendors repeatedly told me that VOIP was the solution. Of course it was. But I was also told that it could be done over cable-modems and SDSL. My own figuring told me no, yet I listened to the experienced vendor. No, it can't be done that way and it wasn't.

While the main office, which has a hybrid digital and VOIP phone system, works flawlessly, the branch office have been left in bad shape due to poorer than expected voice quality. The main office project ran into cost overruns because the vendor, CBS Whitcom (site), has no concept of project management or the limits of the technology they hock. Though we had used them for 15-years, that made no difference in the level of care shown in setting up the project. While its sales rep and "lead engineer" (and I do mean that sarcastically) insisted that the setup was workable and that they do it all the time, the site technicians stated it couldn't be done in the first hour they appeared (prior to showing up the techs hadn't even been informed what the job was). Thankfully the techs were smart, competent people and over the next few days made the system at the main office work, but only after we wound up spending a couple thousand more than originally projected due to oversights by the lead engineer.

The false guarantees of CBS Whitcom about VOIP capabilities have stranded the company. The project should have been finished months before I left but it continues to be worked on months after. I feel terrible about this. At least if the system worked, albeit delayed, there would be some closure. Certainly lessons were learned. The biggest was vendors will not treat you fairly just because you're a non-profit. Money is money.

To sooth my guilt-ridden soul, I'm wondering if anyone else was taken as badly as I was.

5 Comments:

  • Sorry, I think you were taken on this one. I'm in the middle of checking out VOIP vendors myself and the four I've checked with: Inter-Tel, Fonality and two Avaya vendors were adamant in telling me that VOIP over public Internet isn't that great. They mostly pointed out that it's slightly worse than cellphone. In fact, they're specifying point-to-point T1 if you want clean TDM-like connectivity. It does make sense doesn't it? ADSL and cable isn't exactly well-known for clean latency-free connections and that's what you need for VOIP. Use the Force. Learn to trust your instincts.

    By Anonymous abenamer, at 10 January, 2007 13:01  

  • I definitely got taken by Norvergence, a telecom company that took in thousands of small businesses. They brought in a T1 and ran your outbound voice and data over that; your inbound continued to be on POTS lines. It was kind of a goofy set-up, but the savings seemed worth it, and I felt like I did my due diligence - calling references, some Internet searches, etc. Then a few months after I left that employer, I got a panicked call from my previous employer saying that Norvergence had suddenly entered Chapter 9, they had no phone or Internet service (except the remaining POTS lines, thank goodness, and what should they do?

    I felt terrible for them, and tried to counsel them as best I could - they were able to get DSL fairly quickly and upgrade their POTS service, but I still don't know how they fared with the equipment lease - the crux of the Norvergence scam. They leased these "Matrix" boxes for outrageous sums over the life of the lease, when it was really a $500 router. Though I questioned the lease cost as a percentage of the total recurring charges, the total of the recurring charges was low enough that we decided to go with it, on my strong recommendation.

    By Blogger thomas, at 10 January, 2007 13:43  

  • Hey I got taken in by Norvergence too. Those terms were just too good but my boss at the time saved both my hide and his by refusing to sign the contract. He hated long-term contracts and that genereal principle applied to Norvergence. So I WAS taken but cooler heads prevailed... It's a lesson I've adopted for many of my telecom contracts.

    By Anonymous abenamer, at 10 January, 2007 17:24  

  • I've been having good luck with VoicePulse. They have a couple of different plans, including one that integrates well with Asterisk / Trixbox.

    By Blogger Larry Keyes, at 10 January, 2007 18:44  

  • Hi

    Thats a really interesting post.I use skype at home via desktop PC with a mike and a webcam. Its great for keeping in touch with the in law.

    We use interoute at work as our
    voip solution.

    Will look to make get skype added to my mobile phone

    By Blogger Tony Heywood, at 11 July, 2008 10:47  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home