<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yosemite Backup Standard versus Symantec Backup Exec</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.todayicried.com/it/2006/07/yosemite-backup-standard-versus-symantec-backup-exec.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.todayicried.com/it/2006/07/yosemite-backup-standard-versus-symantec-backup-exec.html</link>
	<description>Non-profit IT is technical social work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:12:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.todayicried.com/it/2006/07/yosemite-backup-standard-versus-symantec-backup-exec.html/comment-page-1#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todayicried.com/it/2006/07/yosemite-backup-standard-versus-symantec-backup-exec.html#comment-70</guid>
		<description>bleh @ yosemite... its too damn slow compated to backup exec... symantec shaves around 3 hours off our backup</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bleh @ yosemite&#8230; its too damn slow compated to backup exec&#8230; symantec shaves around 3 hours off our backup</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.todayicried.com/it/2006/07/yosemite-backup-standard-versus-symantec-backup-exec.html/comment-page-1#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todayicried.com/it/2006/07/yosemite-backup-standard-versus-symantec-backup-exec.html#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I feel your pain. I am using 9x on a novell/windows/linux mix and am having problems with throughput across the network. Tried everything tech support has suggested, no help. They (symantec) actually suggested I move the media server to a windows base instead of novell. I downloaded the 60 day trial and while it seemed to work well locally on the windows box, I have had nothing but problems with the remote agent on a novell box. Unable to push the agent, remote agent wont load, Once loaded the media server could not find it, unable to get decent throughput (109MB/min locally, 4 (yes FOUR)MB/min on remote agent, remote agent at 100% utilization during backup blah blah blah. Been going back and forth with online support for days, only to fix one problem and introduce 4 more.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And they want me to pay $500 for the media server and $170 for each remote agent? Not at this time thank you very much.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We to are going to look at Yosemite. Hope it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel your pain. I am using 9x on a novell/windows/linux mix and am having problems with throughput across the network. Tried everything tech support has suggested, no help. They (symantec) actually suggested I move the media server to a windows base instead of novell. I downloaded the 60 day trial and while it seemed to work well locally on the windows box, I have had nothing but problems with the remote agent on a novell box. Unable to push the agent, remote agent wont load, Once loaded the media server could not find it, unable to get decent throughput (109MB/min locally, 4 (yes FOUR)MB/min on remote agent, remote agent at 100% utilization during backup blah blah blah. Been going back and forth with online support for days, only to fix one problem and introduce 4 more.</p>
<p>And they want me to pay $500 for the media server and $170 for each remote agent? Not at this time thank you very much.</p>
<p>We to are going to look at Yosemite. Hope it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

